The Carolina Panthers didn’t want to completely tear down their receiving corps last offseason, but that’s how it played out. A year later, it’s helpful to look back at what happened with the wideouts to further understand how general manager Dave Gettleman approaches free agency.
As I explained last week after my interview with Gettleman at the Senior Bowl, we spent nearly the entire 30 minutes talking football philosophy. The hope was to pass on nuggets that would be helpful to remember as this offseason unfolds.
A few of you commented that Gettleman’s quotes about free agency and the draft weren’t all that new, and that’s true. The problem is, many fans will still get their hearts set on a free agent wideout or assume Gettleman already has a left tackle picked out for the draft. If and when those things don’t happen, those same fans will be upset or confused, so some things may be worth repeating.
His quotes in this post aren’t earth-shattering, either, but if you want to keep trying to get into the head of the man, hopefully they help.
So back to the Great Receiver Rebuild of 2014. Steve Smith obviously wasn’t a financial decision, so for the sake of this discussion, let’s put him aside. The two guys to focus on are Brandon LaFell and Ted Ginn. Before getting into numbers, here’s a Gettlemanism:
“The litmus test for signing a player to a free agent contract or drafting a guy is: How quickly are you upset at what you did? If you sign a free agent and you’re upset before the ink is dry, you made a mistake. If you draft a guy and you’re upset five minutes after the pick, you made a mistake. The goal is to avoid that.”
According to league sources, the Panthers were interested in re-signing LaFell and Ginn when they became free agents last spring. But:
“This is why you have to really evaluate your players first. You place a value on them,” Gettleman said.
To be clear, he’s not talking about LaFell, Ginn or any other specific players in these quotes. It’s all hypotheticals.
So after the 2013 season, the Panthers evaluated their 22 unrestricted free agents, including LaFell and Ginn. They were then assigned a value. Gettleman would have brought them back at the prices he thought they were worth, but other teams offered more. Each received three-year deals, with LaFell getting a reported $9 million from the Patriots and Ginn $9.75 million from the Cardinals.
You could argue LaFell’s production was worth $3 million this year, but Ginn’s wasn’t. Ultimately, Gettleman held his line and let others pay what he felt was above-value.
Of course, while an entire receiving corps was leaving, the Panthers had to sign some guys to replace the departed. One obvious candidate appeared to be Hakeem Nicks, who was in New York while Gettleman was in the Giants’ front office.
Gettleman talked to Nicks, and there was some mutual interest, but the Colts were willing to pay a reported $3.5 million for one season. Gettleman wasn’t.
Here’s another Gettlemanism:
“Say you have an unrestricted free agent. I’m really interested in this UFA. He can help us. I don’t turn around and say, ‘We’re going to pay this UFA X amount of dollars.’ I’m going to ask, ‘Where does the UFA fit at his position?’
“If that UFA is a second-tier player, I’m going to pay that UFA second-tier money. I’m going to pay market value. I’m not going to pay top-tier money if the UFA doesn’t warrant it. That fails the litmus test, doesn’t it? It’s about value.”
Would LaFell have been a better option than Jerricho Cotchery this past season? Probably. Would Ginn have been helpful as a returner? Yup. Would Nicks have been more productive than Jason Avant? Sure. But were the three worth a combined $9.75 million? That doesn’t seem like a good value.
Next week, in part three from my conversation with Gettleman, we’ll get into the Panthers’ offensive philosophy, plus Cam Newton as a pocket passer.